Architect vs architectural designer: which do you actually need?
Confused about architects vs architectural designers? Here's the real difference, what each costs, and which you actually need.
If you've started researching an extension or conversion, you've probably seen both terms, and they're often used as if they mean the same thing. They don't, quite, and understanding the difference can save you money.
What's protected, and what isn't
In the UK, "architect" is a legally protected title under the Architects Act 1997. To call themselves an architect, a person must be registered with the Architects Registration Board (ARB), which involves around seven years of training and examination. "Architectural designer" (or architectural technologist/technician) is not a protected title, these are skilled professionals who design buildings and prepare planning and construction drawings, often with decades of hands-on experience, but who aren't ARB-registered architects.
Does that matter for your project?
For large, complex, or highly bespoke buildings, a chartered architect's full service can be worth the premium. But for the vast majority of home projects, extensions, loft and garage conversions, renovations, and many new builds, an experienced architectural designer delivers exactly what you need: a well-designed scheme, a strong planning application, and the technical drawings to build it.
What you actually need for a typical home project
- A good design that works for how you live and suits the property.
- A planning application (or permitted-development confirmation) handled properly.
- Building-regulations drawings and structural calculations so it can be built and signed off.
How to choose
Look at experience, local track record, reviews, and whether they'll manage the planning for you. Ask to see projects like yours, and make sure you understand the fees at each stage.
Talk to us
Free 30-minute consultation, no obligation.